Category Archives: Achdut

Surprising Theological Agreements: There Is Only One

There is a fascinating article "How not to make halachic rulings "  by Dr Daniel Sperber that is worth while reading. However, there is one particular segment that really came as a surprise to me. In the context of the sheitls made from India he goes into a whole debate whether in fact Hinduism (at least in some versions) is really monotheistic and compatabile/acceptable(?) to Judaism. Read the entire article for some important cavets, but the following extracts should serve as food for though – very interesting indeed:

On the fifth and sixth of February this year, I participated in the first "Hindu-Jewish Leadership Summit" at Delhi, India. This summit was attended by a delegation of the Chief Rabbinate of Israel and some prominent European rabbis, and religious leaders of the Hindu Dharma. I was asked to participate, perhaps because I had served briefly as a rabbi in India many years ago, and was therefore thought to have some understanding of Indian culture and religion.

Many leading Achariahs and Swamis from all over India were present, and a very lively and probing dialogue took place. In our discussions we asked them whether Hinduism is a polytheistic and idolatrous religion, and they all unanimously and most vigorously denied such an assertion, explaining the apparent outward manifestations of idolatry in a completely different fashion.

At the end of the conference, a "Declaration of Mutual Understanding and Cooperation" was co-signed by all participants. Perhaps the most significant clause in the whole document in this context is the opening one:

The participants affirmed that:

1) Their respective traditions teach Faith in One Supreme Being
who is the Ultimate Reality, who has created this world in its
blessed divinity and who has communicated Divine ways of action
for humanity for different peoples in different times and places.

[1]  They base this assertion on passages from the most ancient and canonical of their sacred writings, whose formulations surely attest to such belief. The following are some examples that they offer:

Rgveda Sambita

There is one reality; the wise speak of it in various ways. Rg. Veda.I.164.46c

Chandogya Upanisad (Sama Veda)

Only one non-dual limitless reality. ChU 6.2.1

Brhadaranyaka Upanisad (Shuklayajur Veda)

There is no second thing here at all. BrU 4.4.19

Taittiriya Upanisad (Krsnayajur Veda)

The one that is in this person is the one that is in the universe; he is one. TaiU 2.8.5

Katha Upanisad: (Krsnayajur Veda)

He has no sound, no texture, no form, is changeless, free from taste, time and smell, has no beginning or end, is beyond the intellect and absolutely constant. KaU 1.3.15

A series of verses (2.2.9-12) in this Upanisad uses illustrations to show that the one being is both immanent and transcendent.

Just as fire, which is one, having entered the world, assumed a form corresponding to each of its manifestations, so too the being self within all beings, who is one, assumed a form corresponding to each, yet is apart (transcendent). KaU 2.2.9

Just as air, which is one, having entered the world, assumed a form corresponding to each of its manifestations, so too the being within all beings, who is one, assumed a form corresponding to each, yet is apart (transcendent). KaU 2.2.10

Just as the sun, which is the eye of the world, is not touched by the defects of external things that are seen, so too the being within all beings, who is one and transcendent, is not touched by the grief of the world. KaU 2.2.11

One being within all beings, who is the master, who makes a single form manifold – those wise ones who recognize clearly that one who abides in themselves, have lasting happiness, not anyone else. KaU 2.2.12

Svetasvatara Upanisad (Krsnayajur Veda)

The one effulgent being, hidden in all beings, all-pervasive, the being/self within all beings, who presides over actions and their results, who dwells in all beings, the witness, consciousness, who is absolute and free from attributes, SvU 6.11

Kena Upanisad (Sama Veda)

That which is not revealed by speech, and by which speech is revealed; know only that as Brahaman, not what people worship as an object. KaU 1.5

That which is cannot be thought of by the mind, and because of which, they say, the mind thinks: know only that as Brahman, not what people worship as an object. KaU 1.6

That which one does not see with the eyes, and because of which the eyes see; know only that as Brahman, not what people worship as an object. KaU 1.7

Mundaka Upanisad (Atharva Veda)

The one who cannot be seen or grasped, who has no lineage or class, no ear or eye (no limitation in knowledge) or hand or foot (no limitation in power), is free from time, all-pervasive, extremely subtle, changeless and the source of all beings, the wise ones recognize clearly. MuU 1.6

Sikh Delegation meets Rabbi Froman

As mentioned in a previous post , Rabbi Froman is a peacemaker, trying to build bridges between distant, often warring communities. With so much bad press surrounding Orthodox jews of late, I thought it would be beneficial to bring some attention to some good news items (This happened a couple of years ago, but still good news nonetheless)

Here are some great pictures of him meeting a delegation of Sikhs.

 

 

See here for some more great pictures and the full article:

A message to the dividers

Healing the rift in Orthodoxy

Healing the rift within Orthodoxy
Jul. 22, 2008
Michael Freund, THE JERUSALEM POST

It's summer time, and Tisha Be'av, when Jews mourn the destruction of
the Temple in Jerusalem, is less than three weeks away.

Normally during this period, religious Jews tend to focus on themes
relating to the need for greater Jewish unity, in line with the
talmudic statement that it was the very absence of such cohesion which
led to our destruction and exile some two millennia ago.

But these aren't normal days – far from it – and the mercury in the
thermometer isn't the only thing heating up.

Ever since the conversion crisis erupted nearly three months, the war
of words between religious Zionists and haredim has grown increasingly
fiery, threatening to drive a stake right through the heart of
Orthodox Jewry.

Indeed, one of the consequences of the ruling by the haredi-dominated
Rabbinical High Court retroactively annulling conversions performed by
religious Zionist Rabbi Haim Druckman was to swing open the floodgates
of hateful intra-Orthodox rhetoric.

Spokesmen for both sides quickly manned the barricades, and wasted
little time hurling insults and invective at each other.

On May 7, for example, Bar-Ilan University's Dr. Asher Cohen wrote an
article in Makor Rishon comparing the Lithuanian branch of haredi
Orthodoxy to the murderous Taliban in Afghanistan, and decried what he
described as "haredi halachic Bolshevism."

Is this the language of respectful discourse? The haredi media was no
less discourteous in its approach. The daily Yated Ne'eman, in its
reporting on the controversy, repeatedly refused to use the title
"rabbi" when referring to Druckman.

And on May 25, the editorial in the haredi daily Hamodia denounced
Druckman's conversions in harsh terms, belittling them as "one big act
of clowning."

These are just a few choice pearls of the cruel and undignified
attacks that have been launched by both sides against one another in a
decidedly unspiritual-like display of deprecation.

Even normally cooler heads have started to join the fray, as a growing
number of moderate religious Zionist rabbis speak openly of "freeing
Israel" from "ultra-Orthodox hegemony".

As an Orthodox Jew, I find this clash deeply troubling.

WHILE THE dispute between the two camps pre-dates the establishment of
the state, driven by ideological differences over Zionism, events in
recent years have further heightened the discord.

Disagreements over how to oppose the 2005 Gaza withdrawal, and
controversy surrounding the observance of shmita, brought to the fore
a sense of loathing and even hate that simply has no place in a
spiritually-oriented community.

Frankly speaking, this is not the Torah way.

And if cooler heads don't prevail, and soon, it could cause lasting
damage to the inner fabric of Orthodox Jewry, potentially tearing the
community apart.

The dangers inherent in such a split are obvious. As it stands now,
Orthodox Jews are a minority among world Jewry, and there is nothing
to be gained by a division among the ranks.

Moreover, so much of what Orthodox Jewry believes in, from traditional
values to public decency, is currently under assault. Can we really
afford to be expending valuable time and energy excoriating one
another when everything we hold dear is under attack? We must find a
way to mend the schism within Orthodoxy.

• Step number one in healing the rift: tone down the rhetoric and turn
up the respect.

After all, on nearly all the major theological issues, from the
centrality of Torah to the primacy of Halacha, we basically agree with
one another. Sure, there are differences, and they are far from
insignificant, but personal attacks and insults, public humiliation
and disgrace, must be banished once and for all from our civil discourse.

• Step number two is surprisingly simple: create an exchange program
between religious Zionist and haredi yeshivot. Once a month, on every
Rosh Hodesh, students from religious Zionist and haredi academies
should get together and study Torah and Talmud.

Let them pore over biblical passages in unison, grapple with the
complexities of the medieval Tosafists and stretch their minds
together trying to figure out the meaning of Maimonides. That
experience alone would generate newfound mutual respect on both sides,
and would regularly serve to underline just how much the Torah can
bring us together.

It would also tear down the prejudice and preconceived notions that
prevail, and in communities that value scholarship, no one could
possibly object to the simple act of learning and studying together.

• Step number three: bring pressure to bear on public figures in the
religious Zionist and haredi worlds to take active steps towards
forging greater unity.

These can include organizing annual summits of leading rabbis from the
various streams of Orthodoxy, the issuance of joint declarations, and
the publication of compilations of halachic works by both Zionist and
haredi rabbis.

JEWISH HISTORY is replete with heated disputes. But now especially, as
Tisha Be'av nears, and the embers of the conversion crisis continue to
burn, Orthodoxy's varied adherents would do well to recall the words
of Rabbi Naftali Tzvi Yehuda Berlin, the famed Netziv of Volozhin. In
his introduction to the book of Genesis, he cites one overriding
reason to explain why the generation that endured the destruction of
Jerusalem at the hands of the Romans warranted such punishment nearly
20 centuries ago.

"Due to the baseless hatred in their hearts towards each other," the
Netziv wrote, "they suspected that those who disagreed with them on
religious matters were Sadducees or heretics. This brought them to
misguided bloodshed and many other evils until the Temple was destroyed."

At this critical point in our nation's saga, it should be clear, we
can ill afford to replicate that fatal mistake.

Always nice to see good news

 

 See story here

A spark of light in the darkness

Why does it take a tragedy to see such achdus? 

Belzer Rebbe visits victoms in hospital 

Satmar Rebbe (Reb Aaron): Yeshiva Massacre, Sad Era for Klal Yisroel

* Update – Even though people will disagree with the following extract, I feel it shows a degree of compassion that until know has not been publicised and should be acknowledged." *

Neturei Karta Sends Pointed Condolences

 

Members of the extreme anti-Zionist Neturei Karta sect wrote letters of condolences to the families of the victims.  Though the letter ends with the traditional consolation, 'May G-d comfort you among the mourners for Zion and Jerusalem,' it mainly uses the murders to justify Neturei Karta's anti-Zionist approach:

"Day and night over these past decades we have been pained and trying to prevent these terrible incidents in the camp of the Hebrews, because ever since the dispute and warring with the non-Jews began here in the Holy Land, they have been trying to avenge themselves with fury and wrath, and Jewish blood has been spilt like water all this time…  Perhaps at such a bitter time as this, the time has come to take stock and to say to the Angel of Death, 'Stop!'  Perhaps we have all been mistaken, perhaps we must recognize that our forefathers were correct during the 2,000 years of Exile in acting with the Gentiles by seeking only peace, mercy, and appeasement, and maybe we will then merit to have G-d sweeten our decree and prevent terrible calamities in the future among our brothers, the entire House of Israel.

"We well know that by our perpetual acts of seeking peace and submission to the Gentiles, we have been suspected by many among the House of Israel as having aided those who murder [us], Heaven forbid – but what can we do that we are commanded by the Torah to look ahead; in order to prevent terrible things and to save the nation, we are marching in 'the path of Exile'… We wish you from the depths of our heart [Divine consolation] and may G-d strengthen your shattered hearts and may you know no more pain."

 

(Source:http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/125558.

See here for what appears to be the orginal source document)

Respect And Dignity For Those We Differ With 2


The following is an excerpt from a letter by R’ Samson R. Hirsch to R’ Zvi Hirsch Kalischer.The letter was written in 1864 and appears in Shemesh Marpeh, p.211. It outlines to me once again that the true Gedolim, even when they disagreed with one another, did so with the utmost respect and dignity. {Letter duplicated from here}


My wisdom is too small to recognize what good or true [things] your lofty opinion holds will result from your efforts regarding the settlement of Eretz Yisrael. What, to your heart, appears to be a mitzvah and a great obligation, to my weak mind does not appear so. In my humble opinion, since I have no business with secrets [such as when mashiach will come], there is no good [way] except to follow the well-worn path of our fathers and predecessors, their souls are in Eden. They taught us only to concern ourselves with using all our strength to put ourselves on the road of Torah, to remove stumbling blocks from our path, and to anticipate the redemption daily if we will hearken to His voice. They never placed [the responsibility] on our shoulders to pave a way for the redemption by strengthening and fixing the Holy Land, but rather by strengthening and fixing our hearts and our deeds.

My vision is too short to see the dawn of the redemption in the fact that some [Jewish] families are close to royalty [a reference to British Prime Minister Disraeli and French Senator and Justice Minister Cremiuex]. Virtually all of them, except the one and unique lord who lives here [i.e., Baron Willy Rothschild], are far from the ways of the Torah and mitzvot, and they are counted among the new ones who have thrown off the yoke of religion . . . Moreover, what can I do? Everyone who has come from there [i.e., Eretz Yisrael] and all my confidants assure me that it is impossible for any real good to come out of this because of the difficult times and the awful state of the country. Also, my worry cannot rest lest we see another stumbling block on the Holy Land through transgression of the Shabbat and of the agricultural laws that relate to the Land . . . If I am mistaken, may the good G-d forgive. [Nevertheless,] I have never spoken a word of this in public and I do not say, "Accept my opinion." It was never my intention to cast aspersions on your honor and those who follow you and whose lofty opinions agree with yours. However, man only knows what he sees. As long as our intentions are good and our goal is to do the mitzvot of our Creator as we see it, one will act and one will refrain, one will be rewarded for acting and one for holding back, and the good G-d will forgive the one who errs and causes others to err. With these words I have fulfilled my obligation.


Respect And Dignity For Those We Differ With

My previous post was link to a brilliant shiur by R’ Mayer Schiller. While browsing the internet I came across another post that highlights the same point. It is by R’Eliyahu W. Ferrell of "Einei HaEdah" and is entitled "Ailu V’Ailu". It is evidence that Gedolim of opposite camps truly held each other in the highest esteem despite the great differences between them. There are many misconceptions regarding the attitude of Gedolim to their peers in Torah, hopefully this will help in setting the record straight. It is not right that the memory of great men should be tarnished because of the erroneous slander that so unfortunately permeates our midst .The quotes below should serve as an example to all of us, teaching us how to trully respect and honour others even if we disagree. Below is repost of that entry:

Rav Avrohom Yitzchok HaKohen Kook, Zatzal: The Perspective of the Chofetz Chaim, Zatzal
Rav Aharon HaKohen, the son-in-law of the Chofetz Chaim, wrote the following in 1928:
My father-in-law very much esteemed and loved [“HaMokir U’Mechaveiv M’od”] Rav Kook, and his soul was very pained [“Da’avah M’od”] when he heard about those who sought to persecute him [“Odos HaRedifos Alav”].
From Igros LaRAYaH, #30

Rav Hershel Schachter: The Perspectives of HaGaon Rav David Lifshitz, Zatzal, and HaGaon Rav Pinchas Hirschprung, Zatzal
HaGaon Rav David Lifshitz, Zatzal, and HaGaon Rav Pinchas Hirschsprung, Zatzal, wrote approbations ["haskamos"] for one or more of Rav Hershel Schachter’s works. Here are translated excerpts:

Rav Lifshitz [haskama to Eretz HaTzvi]
"My friend, the consummate Torah-scholar [‘Yedidi, HaRav HaGaon’], Rabbi Hershel Schachter, may he live a long and good life [‘Shlita’], informed me of the good news [‘Hishmee’ani Tovos B’Baseiro’]" that he is publishing a work of Torah-scholarship. "As for me, how dear is HaRav HaGaon Shlita, for I know him from when he was a youth as a distinguished student in in our yeshiva [and] and he showed with great clarity that he was destined for greatness [‘Her’ah B’Alil She-No’ad L’Gadlus’], as we understood the case to be [that he would achieve Gadlus], so have we seen…" Rav Lifshitz explains that he did not have time to examine the work in its entirety, but nonetheless, he states, "We can presume that his words will generate joy and wisdom, illuminating the eyes and refreshing the spirit…"

Rav Hirschprung [haskama to B’Ikvei HaTzon]
"Rabbi Hershel Schachter, the distinguished consummate Torah-scholar [‘HaGaon HaMuvhak’] sent me his work for an approbation…I was amazed [‘Hishtomamti’] at the largesse of the breadth of his knowledge in all aspects of Torah-scholarship and at his many well-predicated novellae."

The Bostoner Rebbe, Shlita, on Reb David Hatuel and his Kehillah
"There are people like David Hatuel who live the life of a tzaddik–‘Ve’tzaddik be’emunaso yichyeh.’ We must not disregard any group (or individual) because they do not understand the mitzvah of yishuv Eretz Yisrael the same way we do. We certainly must not disrespect any group that contains such an outstanding Jew as David Hatuel just because their dress, while conforming to the halachas of tznius, is different from ours. The main factor must be the emunah shleimah."

"We must understand that what they are doing is not done for any financial profit or out of the ‘kochi ve’otsem yodi’ of the founding Zionists, which was not based on any shred of emunah. We must understand our neighbors, their motivations and their goals. When we are told not to judge our friend until we reach his position, it means until we really understand his fundamental outlook and what drives him, and not merely what we think of him."

from "Immeasurable Faith Amidst Unspeakable Tragedy," by the Bostoner Rebbe, Shlita, in Jewish Press, May 2004

The Rav, Zatzal: The Perspectives of Rav Moshe, Zatzal, and HaGaon Rav Mordechai Gifter, Zatzal
In 1983, the Student Organization of Yeshiva University published a volume of Torah works to honor the Rav, Zatzal, on his 80th birthday. It was entitled, K’vod HaRav. The volume contained works by Torah-scholars from within and without Yeshiva University. Among these works was a teshuvah (responsum) from Rav Moshe, Zatzal, and a chibbur (article) from HaGaon Rav Mordechai Gifter, Zatzal. The following is a translation of what Rav Moshe and Rav Gifter wrote as prefaces to their respective pieces:

Rav Moshe:
“I am writing now (‘Basi B’Zeh‘) to send my blessing to the editors of the Jubilee volume that the students of the great consummate Torah-scholar, our teacher, Rav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik, may he live a long and good life (‘HaGaon HaGadol Moreinu HaRav Yosef Dov Soloveitchik Shlita‘), arranged in his honor, to mark his 80th birthday. And [I also write] to express my prayer that G-d lengthen the days and years of my great friend, with a good ‘old age, vigorous and fresh they shall be,’ and that he should continue to disseminate Torah publicly and to occupy himself with the needs of the community, for the sake of the honor of G-d and His Torah, and for the splendor (‘Tif’eres’) of our families. With friendship and esteem (’Hukra‘), Moshe Feinstein.”

Rav Gifter:
“Upon the reaching of the age of 80 by the Rosh Yeshiva, HaGaon Rav Yosef Dov HaLevi Soloveitchik, Shlita, I remember his arrival in the United States and his father’s joy–my mentor, HaGaon Rav Moshe Soloveitchik, Zatzal–with a wise son that brings joy to his father…Upon his reaching the age of 80, may G-d strengthen him so that he can continue to disseminate Torah and to develop students who understand the Torah…”

The Rav, Zatzal, and HaGaon Rav Aharon Kotler, Zatzal
These passages are from "A Fire In His Soul," which is the biography of the great Oskan B’Tzorchei Tzibbur, Reb Irving Bunim, Z"L, written by his son, Rav Amos, Shlita. Rav Bunim sheds a great a deal of light on the relationship between HaGaonim Rav Aharon Kotler and Rav Yosef Dov HaLevi Soloveitchik, Zichronom L’Veracha.
["Bunim" here always refers to Reb Irving and "the Rosh Yeshiva" here always refers to Rav Kotler.]

p.211
"Bunim saw that the Rosh Yeshiva always distinguished between people and the principles they professed. Bunim never saw him attack another Jew, except for those who negated the Torah. A person’s opinion might be at fault, Rabbi Kotler said, but never the person. Rabbi Kotler could disagree vehemently with a fellow gadol’s opinion while respecting him for his Torah knowledge and middos."

p.212
"[Rav Kotler] differed with Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchick’s approval of secular education and secular Zionism. Still, Rabbi Kotler invited Rabbi Soloveitchik to be honorary chairman of Chinuch Atzmai’s first annual dinner. During his speech, Rabbi Soloveitchik spoke in strong support of Chinuch Atzmai (a bold move since his own Mizrachi party supported the mamlachti dati day schools) and praised Rabbi Kotler as the gadol ha-dor. Rabbi Kotler began tugging at Rabbi Soloveitchik’s sleeve and, with tears running down his face begged him to stop, saying, ‘No, no, dos is nisht emes [that is not true]!’"

p.371-2
[Rav Soloveitchik describing Rav Kotler in his aforementioned speech]
"Something in him speaks, as I would imagine Reb Yoshe Ber Brisker once spoke. Something in him speaks as I would imagine the Chasam Sofer once spoke: indignation, wonderment, anguish and an invoking of one’s responsibility. And [ ] I mean not only the erudition of a gadol m’gedolei ha-dor because to be a gadol–scholarship alone is insufficient. The qualities of a gadol, besides Torah, are warmth, exuberance, tolerance, wonderment: "and warm yourself in the light of talmidei chachamim"–to benefit from their light is not enough. Cold light is worthless; there must be searing light so that one burns himself in its proximity. Reb Aharon, the great Rosh Yeshiva, has no cold light in him; it is hot; it kindles. And as you approach him, you, in turn, become enkindled…I would like to request that the entire audience rise and pay homage."

HaGaon Rav Avrohom Yitzchok HaKohen Kook, Zatzal: The Perspective of the Chazon Ish, Zatzal
“R. Yitzchak Gerstenkorn, the founder of B’nei Brak, told this story: In 5694 (1934), the Rav [i.e., Rav Avraham Yitzchak Kook] was invited to the groundbreaking ceremony of the Beit Yosef (Novardok) Yeshiva in B’nei Brak…At the ceremony, which the Chazon Ish also attended, Rav Kook spoke at length…Throughout the Rav’s address, the large crowd sat quietly in their seats–everyone but the Chazon Ish. He remained standing throughout the speech, listening attentively to every word. He only sat down when the Rav finished speaking and took his own seat."

"R. Tzvi Kagan, who was present at the event, added this revealing piece of information: When the Rav’s address began to draw out, people approached the Chazon Ish and suggested that he sit down. The revered rabbi refused, however, saying, ‘The Torah is standing!’”

from An Angel Among Men, by Simcha Raz, p.375; translated by Rav Moshe D. Lichtman

It’s worth noting that, in his review of this work, Rav Berel Wein stated, "There is so much about Rav Kook that is misunderstood and misportrayed in the Jewish world, that a book that portrays him accurately is invaluable and necessary. This is such a book."

In a letter from the Chazon Ish to Rav Kook that is seen on p. 374 of this work, we see that the Chazon Ish opened by saying, “HaRav HaRoshi HaGaon Rav Avraham Yitzchak HaKohen Kook, Hod K’vod Maran Shlita.” (“The Chief Rabbi, the consummate Torah-scholar, Rav Avraham Yitzchak HaKohen Kook, the glory of the honor of our Master, may he live a long and good life.”)

HaGaon Rav Avrohom Yitzchok HaKohen Kook, Zatzal: The Perspective of HaGaon Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, Zatzal
“Rav Shlomo Zalman, in his earlier years, enjoyed a warm relationship with Rav Avraham Yitzchak [HaKohen] Kook, the first [Ashkenazi] Chief Rabbi of Israel. He would visit with him, observe his actions, and learn from him. Their relationship was so close, in fact, that Rav Kook officiated at Reb Shlomo Zalman’s wedding… Reb Shlomo Zalman’s respect for Rav Kook was evident from the numerous stories he would tell which highlighted the brilliant and charismatic attributes of the Chief Rabbi… Reb Shlomo Zalman never ceased to speak of him with the very highest admiration.”

“Reb Shlomo Zalman’s classic work Me’orei Esh contains approbations from Rav Abba Yaakov Borochov, Rav Isser Zalman Meltzer, and Rav Avraham Yitzchak Kook. The approbation which appears first is that of Rav Kook.”

“Considering Reb Shlomo Zalman’s aversion to matters of a political nature, it was startlingly unusual when he intervened in the internal affairs of a particular organization. Needless to say, the Gaon’s advice was always sought and welcomed, but in the area of organization politics, no one had ever succeeded in eliciting his response in the past. The issue at hand was whether to accept a certain candidate for a key position in this Torah organization. Reb Shlomo Zalman had recommended not to accept the nominee. His unprecedented intervention was triggered by the fact that the candidate in question always referred to Rav Kook as simply ‘Kook.’”

“Once the Gaon was riding in a taxi with one of the rabbanim from Kol Torah. His companion began to relate that he had found the explanation of a complex subject under examination at the yeshiva, in a particular book. But when he mentioned the name of the sefer, Reb Shlomo Zalman stopped him and refused to hear the explanation, saying that the book contained denigrating remarks about Rav Kook.”

from “And From Jerusalem, His Word,” by Rav Hanoch Teller, pp.196-198

Dispute in the Orthodox Community

Dispute in the Orthodox Jewish is something that has always been a source of discomfort for those involved and for those reflecting back into history. Here is a couple of sources that I feel shed some positive light on the mechanism of dispute as being of a positive religious value.

"When an individual does not intend to scoff – rather only to state his belief – even if these positions stand against your belief and system, don’t say to him: “Don’t talk, seal your mouth!” For then the system will not be clarified. On the contrary, in such matters we should say: “Speak as much as you want, all that you want to say, so that you will not be able to say that were you granted permission to expand you would have spoken further [and convinced me with your beliefs].” If, however, you do close his [the questioner’s] mouth and prevent him from speaking, that points toward a weakness in the system. This [approach] is the converse of the general impression, which is that it is not permitted to discuss the system, and that thus the system is strengthened. On the contrary! That approach undermines the system! … Thus [through the former approach] a person comes to the inner truth of matters… For [after all], any hero that comes to compete with another to demonstrate his might wants very much that his opponent muster as much strength as possible – then, if the hero overcomes his opponent, he proves that he is the mightier hero. What might, however, does the hero display if his opponent is not permitted to stand strong and wage war against him?"

– Maharal, Be’er Ha’Golah, end of Be’er 7 (free translation)

"You should not allow yourself to be disturbed by the various disputes between the Tzaddikim(as for example the differences of opinion between the Sages of the Mishnah, the Talmud and so on). If a person is troubled by these disputes and states raising all kinds of questions about them, it is a sign that he has allowed some impurity into his mind. It is this internal impurity that is the real source of his doubts. The danger is that his doubts could grow to the point where he becomes permanently separated from the Tzaddikim and their followers, who are the source of true and enduring life. A person should understand that if he finds himself troubled by doubts and questions about the Tzaddikim it is an indication that a flaw exists within himself. If he realizes this, it will help him return to the truth (5:4)."

(Par 1, Chapter on CONTROVERSY AND STRIFE, Likutey Eitzot by Reb Nachman of Breslov http://www.breslov.org/torah/pdf/Advice.PDF )


(1) For an interesting article on the matter of Reb Nachman of Breslov’s view on the matter see the article by Rav Itamar Eldar (http://www.vbm-torah.org/archive/rnachman/21rnachman.rtf)

No Kippah?, no problem!

Hat Tip (Circus Tent by Shturem.net )